Review ArticlePublishedFeatured
Cited by 4

Federated Deep Learning in Intelligent Urban Ecosystems: A Systematic Review of Advancements and Applications in Smart Cities, Homes, Buildings, and Healthcare Systems

A systematic review of privacy-preserving federated deep learning (2018-2025), mapping how distributed training keeps raw data on-device across smart cities, buildings and healthcare, and comparing the privacy mechanisms that make it trustworthy.

Muhammad Adnan Tariq, Sunawar Khan, Tehseen Mazhar, Tariq Shahzad, Sahar Arooj, Khmaies Ouahada, Muhammad Adnan Khan, Habib Hamam

Corresponding author: Muhammad Adnan Khan: adnan@gachon.ac.kr

Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences (CMES)Tech Science Press2026
Studies included
170
Screened from 889 identified records
Literature window
2018-2025
Privacy-preserving FDL developments
Application domains
3
Smart cities, homes/buildings/IoT, healthcare
Roadmap horizon
2035
Open problems and future research agenda
View on DOIDownload PDF

Abstract

The contemporary smart cities, smart homes, smart buildings, and smart health care systems are the results of the explosive growth of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and deep learning. Yet, the centralized training paradigms have fundamental issues in data privacy, regulatory compliance, and ownership silo alongside the scaled limitations of the real-life application. The concept of Federated Deep Learning (FDL) is a privacy-by-design method that will enable the distributed training of machine learning models among distributed clients without sharing raw data and is suitable in heterogeneous urban settings. It is an overview of the privacy-preserving developments in FDL as of 2018-2025 with a narrow scope on its usage in smart cities (traffic prediction, environmental monitoring, energy grids), smart homes/buildings/IoT (non-intrusive load monitoring, HVAC optimization, anomaly detection) and the healthcare application (medical imaging, Electronic Health Records (EHR) analysis, remote monitoring). It gives coherent taxonomy, domain pipelines, comparative analyses of privacy mechanisms (differential privacy, secure aggregation, homomorphic encryption, Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs), blockchain enhanced and hybrids), system structures, security/robustness defense, deployment/MLOps issues, and the longstanding challenges (non-IID heterogeneity, communication efficiency, fairness, and sustainability). Some of the contributions made are structured comparisons of privacy threats, practical design advice on urban areas, recognition of open problems, and a research roadmap into the future up to 2035. The paper brings out the transformational worth of FDL in building credible, scalable, and sustainable intelligent urban ecosystems and the need to do further interdisciplinary research in standardization, real-world testbeds, and ethical governance.

Overview

This comprehensive review examines Federated Deep Learning (FDL) as a privacy-by-design approach for intelligent urban ecosystems. It systematically covers applications across smart cities (traffic prediction, environmental monitoring, energy grids), smart homes/buildings/IoT (non-intrusive load monitoring, HVAC optimization, anomaly detection), and healthcare (medical imaging, EHR analysis, remote monitoring). The paper addresses fundamental research questions on privacy-preserving methods, algorithms for non-IID data, real-world deployment limitations, and open challenges for scalable, sustainable urban AI systems.

Key Contributions

  • 1Structured comparisons of privacy threats and mechanisms
  • 2Coherent taxonomy and domain pipelines for FDL in urban ecosystems
  • 3Comparative analyses of privacy mechanisms: differential privacy, secure aggregation, homomorphic encryption, TEEs, blockchain-enhanced and hybrids
  • 4Practical design advice for urban deployment
  • 5Recognition of open problems and research roadmap to 2035
  • 6Survey of system architectures, security/robustness defenses, and deployment/MLOps issues

Figures

Diagram showing smart homes, hospitals and traffic sensors connected through an edge server, with a local model update arrow running to a central cloud server.
Figure 1. High-level architecture of federated deep learning in urban ecosystems: smart homes, hospitals and traffic sensors train locally and send only model updates to the central cloud server.
PRISMA flow diagram with five stages: identification of 889 records, screening of 727, full-text assessment of 478, inclusion of 265, and a final selection of 170 studies.
Figure 4. PRISMA-style study selection: 889 records identified across Elsevier, IEEE, Springer Nature, Wiley and MDPI, narrowed through screening and eligibility review to the 170 studies in the final analysis.
Timeline from 2026 to 2035 with four labelled tracks: integration, robustness, sustainability and standardisation, each showing overlapping research themes as horizontal bars.
Figure 16. Research roadmap to 2035 across four tracks — integration, robustness, sustainability and standardisation — from 6G and edge intelligence through to large-scale deployment.

Methodology

This review adopts a systematic review method to aggregate the state-of-the-art in Federated Deep Learning (FDL) in intelligent urban ecosystems. Literature searches were conducted in IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, and PubMed (for healthcare-related FDL). Search queries combined core terms (federated deep learning OR federated learning) with domain-specific terms (smart city OR smart cities, smart home OR smart building OR smart buildings) and privacy/security terms (differential privacy, secure aggregation, homomorphic encryption, trusted execution environment, blockchain). Boolean operators and phrase searches were used; the time window was 2018–2025, with emphasis on high-impact works from 2019–2025. Inclusion criteria: papers explicitly discussing FL/FDL with privacy or security measures and relevance to urban ecosystems (smart cities, homes/buildings/IoT, or healthcare). Exclusion criteria: non-urban FL applications, work without methodology or experimental validation, and papers without quantitative assessment. This process yielded approximately 174 high-quality references, organized through a PRISMA-style study selection flow and coherent taxonomy of FDL across urban domains.

Results & Findings

The review demonstrates substantial progress in FDL for intelligent urban ecosystems from 2018–2025. Algorithmic advances (FedProx, SCAFFOLD, and variants) improve convergence by 15–20% in heterogeneous urban settings. Hierarchical edge–fog–cloud architectures reduce communication latency by 30–50% in large IoT federations, while energy-efficient methods yield 40–70% energy savings in urban IoT deployments. Domain-specific applications show concrete efficacy: spatio-temporal graph neural networks for traffic prediction on benchmarks like METR-LA; federated CNN/U-Net variants for multi-institutional medical imaging on BraTS; and LSTMs for non-intrusive load monitoring in smart buildings. Hybrid privacy approaches combining differential privacy and secure aggregation provide strong privacy guarantees. Nevertheless, several limitations persist: non-IID data distributions cause client drift and accuracy drops; communication overhead remains high (~100× bandwidth before compression); adversarial attacks can reduce global aggregation accuracy by 30–50%; fairness gaps produce 15–25% performance disparities across demographic groups; and energy consumption on battery-powered devices is 2–5× higher per epoch than centralized training. Pilot deployments in Singapore's traffic monitoring and multi-hospital imaging illustrate viability but highlight the need for standardized testbeds and MLOps frameworks.

Conclusion

Federated deep learning has become an irreplaceable paradigm of privacy-preserving intelligence in interconnected urban ecosystems, bridging the enormous possibilities of deep neural networks with the urgent demands of data sovereignty, regulatory compliance, and scalability. This review outlines how developments from 2018–2025 have enabled substantive applications in smart cities, residential and commercial buildings, IoT, and healthcare—from spatio-temporal traffic forecasting to energy-efficient building management, secure cross-institutional medical imaging, and remote patient monitoring. By maintaining data locality while leveraging collaborative training, FDL helps overcome fundamental shortcomings of centralized systems and is better suited to heterogeneous, privacy-conscious urban environments. However, formidable challenges remain: statistical and system heterogeneity, communication bottlenecks, security vulnerabilities, deficits in fairness and explainability, and energy sustainability concerns. Progress in layered privacy mechanisms, robust security defenses, and domain-specific MLOps offers a solid foundation, but the road ahead requires concerted efforts in standardization, realistic benchmarking, ethical governance, and integration with emerging technologies such as 6G, edge intelligence, and privacy-aware large language models. Looking toward 2035, federated deep learning has transformative potential for resilient, equitable, and sustainable urban intelligence. Realizing this vision will require ongoing interdisciplinary collaboration among researchers, policymakers, industry, and urban planners to develop certified, robust, carbon-aware, and publicly accountable federated systems. Ultimately, FDL not only protects individual privacy but also enables harnessing collective intelligence, opening the doors to smarter, safer, and more inclusive cities on a global scale.

Author Affiliations

  1. 1Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal Campus, Sahiwal, 57000, Pakistan
  2. 2School of Computer Science, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
  3. 3Department of Computer Science, Alshifa Institute of Health Sciences, Narowal, 51600, Pakistan
  4. 4Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, 2006, South Africa
  5. 5Department of Software, Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Software, Gachon University, Seongnam-Si, 13557, Republic of Korea
  6. 6Faculty of Engineering, Uni de Moncton, NB E1A3E9, Canada
  7. 7School of Electrical Engineering, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
  8. 8International Institute of Technology and Management (IITG), Av. Grandes Ecoles, Libreville BP 1989, Gabon
  9. 9Bridges for Academic Excellence - Spectrum, Tunis, 1001, Tunisia

Explore More Publications

Check out my other research publications in AI, machine learning, and emerging technologies.

View All Publications